Plessy vs. Ferguson :: essays research papers

Plessy vs.FergusonThe eccentric person of Plessy vs. Ferguson started when a 30-year-old colored deep-dish pie named homer Plessy was put in jail for sitting in the white-hot car of the East Louisiana Railroad on June 7, 1892. Even though Plessy was only one-eighths black and seven-eighths white, he was considered black by Louisiana law. Plessy didnt like this sentiment, and so he went to court and argued in the fibre of Homer Adolph Plessy v. The State of Lousiana that the Separate Car represent, which forced segregation of train cars, break the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth Amendment was made in order to reverse slavery, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to enforce the absolute equality of the cardinal races before the law. The name of Ferguson was given to the case because the judge at the trial run was named John Howard Ferguson. Judge Ferguson had previously declared that the Separate Car Act was unconstitutio nal on trains that traveled through several states, but he ruled that within the state, the state government could choose to regulate the railroad companies that operate within their respective state. The ruling was that the judge undercoat Plessy blameful of refusing to leave the white car. Plessy proceeded to appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which also found him guilty. In 1896, the Supreme Court of the United States heard Plessys case and found him guilty once again.My view on this particular case sides with Plessy rather than Ferguson. I believe in total equality and the idea of no difference between fellow human beings. There should be no distinction made between that which is for the white man, and that which is for the black man.