Capital Punishment On Crimes Other Than Murder

We all agree that killing a somebody on aim is a gain and the killer should be killed, since he gave himself the salutary to do the life of a person for whatsoever reason then the capital punishment exit be the right of taking his life. But with most of the criminal offenses the expiration penalisation should not be utilize, and I say most of the crimes because and about crimes ar considered like collide with so the death penalty should be applied. A crime is giving the right to take or in other words cloak a straggle of the life of a person or a collection of people, for example, robbery, hitting a wife or anybody badly, drugs, etc... All of these crimes are not taking the life of a person so the death penalty should not be applied on the criminal. Killing every criminal will take a sell of time and a lot of money, treating them is a utter(a) option.

Almost every crime is judged different from the other, lets take a double-crosser for example, a spy who caused the death of umpteen people because of his seamy work, this person should not be in jail, he should be on the electric chair, this traitor indirectly took the life of many people, this disloyalty though its considered a crime in law not a murder but its chastely a murder and the capital punishment should be used on this person. In the translation of murder, killing a person on purpose, the word purpose is very important, lets consider a hunter who is hunting deer, he aimed at the deer and dismissed when suddenly a son jumped in front of him and the male child land shot. What is this? Its a murder? For sure no, its a crime that the capital punishment! ... If you want to get a full essay, place it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper